Petitions on WE the PEOPLE White House website about Guns and Insurance

There are currently 2 petitions which are being offered and which call for requiring gun insurance. They are not detailed solutions and have not gained much support.  They are:

Sponsor legislation requiring that all gun owners be required to purchase liability insurance from private carriers
Continue reading

Fine Article on Gun Insurance by Megan McArdle in The Daily Beast

Megan McArdle has written a long piece in The Daily Beast entitled “Should People Be Forced to Buy Liability Insurance for their Guns?” It is by far the most detailed and thought out analysis of the suggestion that I have seen since Newtown. While I don’t agree with her conclusion that the problems make insurance as a solution unworkable, she gives logical reasons that need to be addressed.

She starts with three reasons that we would want insurance. The first is to Continue reading

Systems of Insurance applied to guns

There are many systems of insurance with varying breadths of coverage. The liability insurance that is talked about in the discussion at the moment would only cover a small proportion of the deaths and injuries that are occurring. The systems described below run from something so narrow that provides compensation to only a miniscule proportion those hurt to ones that could be implemented to protect almost all injured persons. Continue reading

Good Washington Post blog article on guns and insurance

Brad Plumer has an excellent article on ‘The economics of gun control.’  It discusses the overall cost to society and the ways that requiring regular liability insurance would help.  It’s the best survey article I’ve seen on the subject so far.  You should also look at the paper he points to by Duke’s Philip Cook and Georgetown’s Jens Ludwig. This paper analyzes the costs to society and gives a broad range of possibilities.

To get to a real solution for our society we’ll need to have insurance outside the box and address the two big no arguments–‘it won’t cover criminals’ and ‘it’s unconstitutional.’  All of these problems are solvable and this kind of journalism is where to start.

Tail insurance a problem in many areas

In various fields there is a problem with people who retire or close down their businesses with ‘tail insurance.’  The problem is that a liability issue can come up much later.  Much of the coverage that’s sold only covers suits that are later reported for injuries that occur during the policy period.  It’s hard or doctors or persons producing lasting products to get coverage for an injury that occurs after the policy expires but is  caused by an action that occured while the person was in business.

Gun insurance will have a similar problem.  If an owners insurance is to cover someone injured long after the gun was lost or stolen, it will have to cover a long tail.  A new structure of insurance will be needed.  But new structures of insurance are created all the time as the world faces new risks.  Good gun insurance will have to be designed with the help of the professional risk analysts.

Continuing calls for Gun Insurance

There has been a stream of media articles and blog posts calling for mandatory gun insurance since Newtown.  Many of them point out the desirability to have the market weigh the risks of different styles of gun ownership and price accordingly. Almost all have an underlying concern about Second Amendment issues with such a requirement but try to state bravely that it won’t ultimately win out. Here are some interesting recent ones. Continue reading

Gun Insurance and this Blog: Some Thoughts

There are, of course, two purposes—to reduce the number of the killed and injured and to provide for people who are hurt.  I want this blog to serve anyone who wants to be thoughtful about this purpose.  Insurance has many aspects which should be examined in coming up with a way to achieve these ends.  We will have to consider the experience of other kinds of insurance and of gun insurance in other countries.  It will be important to analyze the potential costs and unwanted side effects of an insurance requirement.  As they teach in every writing class from High School on, we must look at Who, What, When, Where and How. 

No-Fault concept as it would be for gun insurance

Much of the discussion of gun insurance that is currently going on is for requiring that gun owners have liability insurance covering injuries from their firearms.  There is often a question as to whether it would be necessary for the owner to have been negligent in the incident or if a concept of strict liability would be made to apply.  This would require payment regardless of fault. Continue reading

Mandatory Gun Insurance in other countries

If you have information especially links to English translations of gun laws in other countries please send them to me.  (tom@guninsuranceblog.com) or make a comment to this post.  I have found some information about insurance of 100,000 euros being required in Portugal.  In Germany the amount is one million euros and the law (link to German Weapons Law)  says:

Section 4
Requirements for a licence

(1) In order to be granted a licence, applicants shall

1. be at least 18 years of age (Section 2 (1)),

2. have the necessary reliability (Section 5) and personal aptitude (Section 6),

3. demonstrate the necessary specialized knowledge (Section 7),

4. demonstrate a need (Section 8), and

5. enclose proof of liability insurance cover of one million euros for personal injury and property damage when applying for a weapons licence or shooting licence.